Buy this shirt: https://rainbowtclothingllc.com/product/boston-bruins-ullmark-linus-goalie-goal-first-in-team-history-shirt/
Those are the Boston bruins ullmark linus goalie goal first in team history shirt moreover I will buy this most common rationales that comes to my mind. Of them, only the first makes any sense to me in this day and age. Even then, it’s a tenuous one at best as the IIHF has shown we can have NHL-style hockey (Canada vs USA in the Olympics) with a rule-set that does not condone fighting. The days of “The Code” are especially numbered as our growing concern over catastrophic brain injury is leading to hockey conduct being evaluated in fields where it just doesn’t pass the smell test: the courts and insurance assessments. For example, “The Code” sounds really gallant until it lands a violent player in legal trouble where any defense on the basis of such a tacit understanding of brutality does not stand up to civil litigation (i.e. the pending endgame of Moore vs Bertuzzi).
Also, as player rights and contracts have matured so has the Boston bruins ullmark linus goalie goal first in team history shirt moreover I will buy this underlying worry about the long-term legal responsibility of the NHL in terms of its employee safety and compensation. Fighting isn’t likely to die off because people within the game choose to get rid of it. Rather, it will be reduced to a vestigial quirk because insurers and litigators will eliminate the financial risks associated with random violence. After all, what underwriter would insure the contract of a player who is vulnerable to concussion once the medical evidence about head injury from condoned fighting is more robust?
Comments